TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TenTec] [Fwd: Line Isolator Balun (sorta) question.]

To: tentec@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [TenTec] [Fwd: Line Isolator Balun (sorta) question.]
From: Stuart Rohre <rohre@arlut.utexas.edu>
Reply-to: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Date: Mon, 09 Aug 2010 13:29:44 -0500
List-post: <mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
Thanks, Jerry,
"forced balance" was a poor description.

What I should have said is the late W5YR found that with his simple ferrite cable chokes he was able to use ladder line, (parallel) line with his Tee tuners and had no further hot chassis issues. Now, he was using dipole type antennas, and he lived in an area that has much higher ground conductivity than some areas. His antennas were in the clear, which can affect RF on the shield, if one cannot keep the antenna at right angles to the feedline. Individual results can depend on many issues, and I did not address the issue someone else later raised of the elevated ham shack well above an earthing point. Most of those also need a ground tuner box, or quarter wave counterpoise wires for the band in use, to mitigate RF on the chassis.

His beads were larger than the types on the original bead chokes made commercially. They were of a diameter to enable teflon versions of 1/4 inch coax slipped into them, and had about 3 X the length vs. their outside diameter. From several vendors there is more of a choice in pierced ferrite materials today, than in the first days of cable choke use.

Stuart
K5KVH



<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>