TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TenTec] ant

To: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>, Rick - NJ0IP / DJ0IP <Rick@DJ0IP.de>
Subject: Re: [TenTec] ant
From: Phil Sussman <psussman@pactor.com>
Reply-to: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2011 15:41:05 -0500
List-post: <tentec@contesting.com">mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
I use the Nye-Viking MB-V-A which does well on matching most anything.
It has a tri-filer balun internally and works 1.5KW 

73 de Phil - N8PS

---

Quoting Rick - NJ0IP / DJ0IP <Rick@DJ0IP.de>:

> These are not as good today as their reputation was 40 years ago.
> The reason is, we've got more bands to match today, and our transceivers
> demand darn near 50 Ohms.
> 
> The models were 275w and 1KW.
> I had the KW version about 45 years ago.
> Bought the small one about 2 years ago and didn't keep it long.
> The little MFJ-974B (for under $200) was far superior to the Viking in its
> matching range.
> Had the two side by side and used them with several different Openwire fed
> antennas.
> 
> With the mods Jerry did to his Viking, they will match just about anything.
> 
> A much better box is the Annecke, which L.B. Cebik compares (very favorably)
> to the Johnson in his article about link coupled tuners.
> The Annecke had more taps, especially on the TX side, as well as an
> additional variable capacitor on the TX side.
> It was also available in two versions; 200w and 1KW.
> 
> 73
> Rick
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: tentec-bounces@contesting.com [mailto:tentec-bounces@contesting.com] On
> Behalf Of JAMES HANLON
> Sent: Friday, January 14, 2011 1:37 PM
> To: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment; wa4njy@yahoo.com
> Subject: Re: [TenTec] ant
> 
> Ed,
> 
> Look for a Johnson Matchbox if you want something to tune up an antenna fed
> with open wire line.  They were made in 150 watt and 1 KW versions and some
> had a built-in SWR bridge on the transmitter side.  
> 
> Jim, W8KGI
>   ----- Original Message ----- 
>   From: Ed Purvis<mailto:wa4njy@yahoo.com> 
>   To: tentec@contesting.com<mailto:tentec@contesting.com> 
>   Sent: Friday, January 14, 2011 7:16 AM
>   Subject: Re: [TenTec] ant
> 
> 
> 
>   I need the definition and model number of a "good tuner".Hopefully,
> something without a balun. Maybe somethingalong the lines of the K1JJ
> homebrew tuner also??
>   tnx, Ed
> 
>   IF AT FIRST YOU DON'T SUCCEED, SKY DIVING'S NOT FOR YOU.
> 
> 
>   --- On Thu, 1/13/11, Dr. Gerald N. Johnson
> <geraldj@weather.net<mailto:geraldj@weather.net>> wrote:
> 
>   From: Dr. Gerald N. Johnson
> <geraldj@weather.net<mailto:geraldj@weather.net>>
>   Subject: Re: [TenTec] ant
>   To: tentec@contesting.com<mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
>   Date: Thursday, January 13, 2011, 4:41 PM
> 
>   And 6m and 2m quite well. And probably 160 with a good tuner.
> 
>   73, Jerry, K0CQ
> 
>   On 1/13/2011 3:13 PM, ROD wrote:
>   > If you donâ??t work 160 then a good ant. is the double extended zepp 83
> ft on each side for a total 166 ft feed with 450 or 300 ohm ladder line. with
> a good tuner you can work 80 40 20 15 12 17 10 meters. the hams of yester
> year use this antenna. 73 Rod Dewald W3KRQ
>   > _______________________________________________
>   >
>   _______________________________________________
>   TenTec mailing list
>   TenTec@contesting.com<mailto:TenTec@contesting.com>
>  
> 
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec<http://lists.contesting.com/
mailman/listinfo/tentec>
> 
> 
> 
>         
> _______________________________________________
> TenTec mailing list
> TenTec@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
> 
> _______________________________________________
> TenTec mailing list
> TenTec@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
> 




_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>