TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TenTec] eagle

To: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TenTec] eagle
From: Jim Lowman <jmlowman@sbcglobal.net>
Reply-to: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Date: Sat, 02 Apr 2011 15:27:54 -0700
List-post: <tentec@contesting.com">mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
For those who feel slighted at not getting a full 100 watts on all 
bands, has anyone taken the time to call Tech. Support at Ten-Tec to ask 
why this is happening?
I'm not sure if John Henry monitors this list, but his thing is more 
firmware design than RF.
Before Scott left Ten-Tec, he would often weigh in on concerns like 
this, but I'm not sure that anyone from T-T is a listmember.

Interesting discussion of power-measuring techniques, so carry on...

I'm mostly a QRPer, so if I feel the need for higher power to 
make/maintain a QSO, whether it's 70 watts out or 120 watts out, it's 
going to be an improvement.

Guess I should measure the power output of my Eagle.

73 de Jim - AD6CW

_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>