TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TenTec] Orion III

To: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TenTec] Orion III
From: Carl Moreschi <n4py2@earthlink.net>
Reply-to: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Date: Sat, 14 May 2011 11:37:57 -0400
List-post: <tentec@contesting.com">mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
The NR you are talking about does not exist on any radio.  Still to this 
day I have never seen an NR that truely helps with copy.  They might 
make things quieter but copy is always best under difficult conditions 
with NR off.


Carl Moreschi N4PY
121 Little Bell Dr.
Hays, NC 28635
www.n4py.com

On 5/14/2011 11:12 AM, Tony Lelieveld wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I agree. I'd go with an external panadapter. Why are people rumbling about
> an Orion III? Let's get the O-II finalized first. I am still waiting for
> an upgrade that will improve the NR part of the rig. One that, when you
> activate it, will truly reduce the noise WITHOUT altering the audio quality
> of the voice you're receiving.
>
> On some signals it seems to work okay but mostly it distorts the audio and
> acts erratically and I am running ver. 2.044A. Different settings of the
> AGC threshold and manual AGC level do not seem to make much difference.
>
> 73, Tony VE3DWI
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Barry N1EU"<barry.n1eu@gmail.com>
> To: "Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment"<tentec@contesting.com>
> Sent: Thursday, May 12, 2011 12:29 PM
> Subject: Re: [TenTec] O3 wish list
>
>
>> Well said and totally agree Paul. Limited engineering resources can
>> be put to much better use. If the rig mfr provides I.F. output,
>> they've done their job.
> _______________________________________________
> TenTec mailing list
> TenTec@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
>
_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>