TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TenTec] Omni VII Filters

To: "'Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment'" <tentec@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TenTec] Omni VII Filters
From: "Rick - DJ0IP / NJ0IP" <Rick@DJ0IP.de>
Reply-to: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Date: Thu, 17 May 2012 15:13:04 +0200
List-post: <tentec@contesting.com">mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
Barry, I agree on the SSB point, but this thread was about James wanting to 
start working CW contests.

As I keep bringing up, the problem with SSB is no longer our receivers, it's 
our transmitters.

("our" does not necessarily mean Ten-Tec, though Ten-Tec has nothing to write 
home about).

73
Rick, DJ0IP

-----Original Message-----
From: tentec-bounces@contesting.com [mailto:tentec-bounces@contesting.com] On 
Behalf Of Barry N1EU
Sent: Thursday, May 17, 2012 2:06 PM
To: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment
Subject: Re: [TenTec] Omni VII Filters

On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 3:51 AM, Rick - DJ0IP / NJ0IP <Rick@dj0ip.de> wrote:
> Then if a 59+20 signal plops down 1 kHz away or so, there will be  a 
>difference between an ORION or K3, and a OMNI-VII.

Yes, if the mode is CW.  Not if the mode is SSB because SSB signals (ESPECIALLY 
during contests) are wide.  If you're competing in a SSB contest, it doesn't 
much matter what you use for a receiver as long as it's not a TOTAL piece of 
crap.  Your ultimate performance is not receiver limited.  It's a whole 
different ballgame with CW.

Barry N1EU
_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>