To: | TenTec@contesting.com |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [TenTec] Paragon II Failure to Transmit |
From: | Peter Bertini <radioconnection@gmail.com> |
Reply-to: | Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com> |
Date: | Sat, 19 Jan 2013 19:37:37 -0500 |
List-post: | <tentec@contesting.com">mailto:tentec@contesting.com> |
I may be missing something, but I don't see how the 455kHz mechanical filters can do much to improve the 2nd mixer in band IMD performance for the Omni VII. The limiting factor is the 70 MHz 1st IF filter which has a wide 20 kHz BW. It looks to me the same problem when comparing in close CW performance between my Omni VI and Paragon II. The Paragon has the same 70 MHz 1st IF problem and lack of early protection for the second mixer. (Besides the phase noise issues). Pete k1zjh _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | [TenTec] Fwd: WTB: Older Jupiter, Bill Vallejo |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [TenTec] "Tune" rf power adjustment?, jack |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [TenTec] Paragon II Failure to Transmit, GARY HUBER |
Next by Thread: | Re: [TenTec] Paragon II Failure to Transmit, GARY HUBER |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |