TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TenTec] 565 Low level audio on headphones

To: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TenTec] 565 Low level audio on headphones
From: Kim Elmore <cw_de_n5op@sbcglobal.net>
Reply-to: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Date: Sat, 16 Mar 2013 17:38:52 -0500
List-post: <tentec@contesting.com">mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
Hi Bob,

Well, I "gots to know:" where did you get those?

73,

Kim N5OP

At 10:06 PM 3/15/2013, you wrote:
As Jim K9YC said earlier, it is normal or typical for designers to put some value of series R between the audio output device and the HP connectors. This will prevent shorting of the device should some inadvertent event take place like a shorted HP cord, bad connection or such.

Now with the series resistors then add the HP impedance to ground and one has a voltage divider. The larger the series resistor values and the lower the HP impedance the less voltage across the headphones. It's an Ohm Law thing. The idea is to have a series R of such value that shorting the HP connection to ground will not cause destruction of the headphone amp device. In general, higher impedance headphones i.e. 30 to 65 ohms, should perform better, again depending on the actual sensitivity of the headphones than those headphones of lower impedance values. Yet impedance is not related to headphone sensitivity, so two factors must be considered. Thus headphones of lower impedance should by choice have a higher sensitivity while headphones of higher impedance can have lower sensitivity values.

I recently heard a station with quite good sounding audio and inquired as to his radio and mike being used. He was using a headset with boom mike. He provided me the information and I ordered the item. It has the numbers SM-750M.V and the name Stereo Dynamic Headphones on the band. Nowhere does it say "Made in xxxxx" you fill in the blank. The item was delivered by postal service with a total cost for the merchandise and shipping in the amount of $5.95. Yep, complete to my door for a total of $5.95. I find the headphones work very nicely and sound quite good and are moderately comfortable and even the in-line volume control works. The boom mike has a nice wind screen and when connected to the Omni VII gets great audio reports. Mechanically and structurally, I view the $5.95 purchase is a bit more than a piece of junk. If it didn't work it would be total junk. I would expect parts to fly around the room should I drop the headphones on the floor. I've never seen the likes of molded plastic snapped together. This goes to show that one doesn't have to spend a hundred bucks or so for a name-brand headset that works.

73
Bob, K4TAX




----- Original Message ----- From: "Richards" <jruing@ameritech.net>
To: "Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment" <tentec@contesting.com>
Sent: Friday, March 15, 2013 9:10 PM
Subject: Re: [TenTec] 565 Low level audio on headphones


Er...so, what DO the engineers at TT say about this?   Have you asked them?

I know loads of guys who swear by the CM500 on the Orion and Orion II
and other TT rigs. If you suffer low receiver volume, I suspect something is fundamentally wrong with the radio. Jim Brown is a big fan of the CM500 - and he is serious about audio. If it did not perform well, he would have said so.

I suspect there is something fundamentally wrong with the rig, and adding a band aid resistor is not an appropriate remedy - it might cover for a larger problem, but I doubt that is the best course.

Trust your instincts... discover the real problem. When this happens to me, I ask the local rabble for help in diagnosing it - and they have always helped me find the real root problem, bless their pea-picking hearts !

Just my take.

-------------------------  K8JHR  ----------------------------



On 3/15/2013 6:00 PM, Paul K. wrote:

So, now I am considering looking at the resistor change.  Although, I am
still seeking additional advice and suggestions. I hate second guessing
the engineers at Ten Tec.

________________________________________________________________



.
_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec


_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>