TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TenTec] TT service

To: "'Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment'" <tentec@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TenTec] TT service
From: "Rick - DJ0IP / NJ0IP" <Rick@DJ0IP.de>
Reply-to: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2013 09:00:59 +0200
List-post: <tentec@contesting.com">mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
James is correct.  I misread Gary's post.  Sorry Gary.

Just remove Gary's name from that post and I'm sticking with the rest of my
story!  

I pay James a retainer fee to help keep my act clean!  (-:

73
Rick

-----Original Message-----
From: TenTec [mailto:tentec-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of Richards
Sent: Thursday, July 11, 2013 8:53 AM
To: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment
Subject: Re: [TenTec] TT service



On 7/11/2013 2:13 AM, Rick - DJ0IP / NJ0IP wrote:
> Gary, you are over-simplifying. ...  ALL of these
things and many more contribute to a radio's performance...The story is
complex.  Don't place too much value on any list.

____________________________________________


ER... um... I think you may have misread Gary's post.


-------------  K8JHR ----------------------


_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>