On 7/11/2013 1:57 AM, Rick - DJ0IP / NJ0IP wrote:
James, that was a typical lawyer response.
Nuts to the lawyer comment. My sordid
and embarrassing past has zero to do with
my comment - heck, you rarely hesitate to
correct me.
I can accept your revision, but that is not
what you said before. I only mentioned it
because the first version suggested ranking
by DR3 is not a ranking by "performance." - as
if DB3 is not a matter of "performance."
I am sorry I mentioned it, now.
More focused on the exact
meaning of the words than on the intended content.
The words are all we have to discern the
meaning of what you intend to say.
You could say it is a matter of syntax,
but syntax matters.
For example, punctuation matters, too, and
there is a difference between, "Helping your
Uncle Jack off a horse," and "Helping your
uncle jack..." ;-)
OK, restated, Rob Sherwood does not rank radios by their overall
performance.
He lists them by one single criteria, DR3.
No one said otherwise. It sounded like
you were saying something else. Again,
I sure regret mentioning it.
--------------- K8JHR -------------------
.
_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
|