Re: [TenTec] Wet ladderline

To:	tentec@contesting.com
Subject:	Re: [TenTec] Wet ladderline
From:	Stuart Rohre <rohre@arlut.utexas.edu>
Reply-to:	Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Date:	Fri, 09 Aug 2013 16:26:25 -0500
List-post:	<tentec@contesting.com">mailto:tentec@contesting.com>

The comment someone posted about the losses varying depending on SWRmight be why results are not linear with length.


Stuart
K5KVH
_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Re: [TenTec] Wet ladderline, (continued) Re: [TenTec] Wet ladderline, Jim Brown Re: [TenTec] Wet ladderline -- Comments on QST report, Joel Hallas Re: [TenTec] Wet ladderline -- Comments on QST report, Steve Hunt Re: [TenTec] Wet ladderline -- Comments on QST report, Steve Hunt Message not available Re: [TenTec] Wet ladderline, Steve Hunt Re: [TenTec] Wet ladderline, Stuart Rohre Re: [TenTec] Wet ladderline, Stuart Rohre Re: [TenTec] Wet ladderline, Steve Hunt Re: [TenTec] Wet ladderline, Steve Hunt Re: [TenTec] Wet ladderline, Stuart Rohre Re: [TenTec] Wet ladderline, Stuart Rohre <= Re: [TenTec] Wet ladderline, Steve Hunt Re: [TenTec] Wet ladderline, Richards Re: [TenTec] Wet ladderline, Rick - DJ0IP / NJ0IP Re: [TenTec] Wet ladderline, Wade Staggs Re: [TenTec] Wet ladderline, Rick - DJ0IP / NJ0IP Re: [TenTec] Wet ladderline, Jim Brown Re: [TenTec] Wet ladderline, Steve Hunt Re: [TenTec] Wet ladderline, Jim Brown Re: [TenTec] Wet ladderline, Jim Brown Re: [TenTec] Wet ladderline, Richards

Previous by Date:	Re: [TenTec] Wet ladderline, Stuart Rohre
Next by Date:	Re: [TenTec] Wet ladderline, Steve Hunt
Previous by Thread:	Re: [TenTec] Wet ladderline, Stuart Rohre
Next by Thread:	Re: [TenTec] Wet ladderline, Steve Hunt
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]