TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TenTec] Value of RX Only Antennas

To: tentec@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [TenTec] Value of RX Only Antennas
From: Jim Brown <k9yc@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Reply-to: k9yc@arrl.net, Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Date: Tue, 01 Oct 2013 11:48:55 -0700
List-post: <tentec@contesting.com">mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
On 10/1/2013 7:51 AM, Richards wrote:
These receive only antennas are nice to have, but I figure it is better to improve one's transmit antennas if possible - especially if one can can replace them with antennas with more gain.

RX-only antennas are most useful on bands where it is impractical or expensive to get directivity from your TX antenna -- 160, 80, 60, 40, and 30.

Another VERY important point. Contrary to manufacturers' claims, it is VERY difficult to get much more than about 5 dB gain over a dipole with a collection of aluminum on a boom. That was the clear result of extensive measurements by N0AX and K7LXC of a dozen or so of a broad selection of tri-banders. An M-squared C3 was the best of the small ones, with an average gain of 3.4 dB across the three bands. A Mosley TA33 was only 1.6 dB (loss in the traps made the difference). An M-squared C-31XR (31 ft boom) was the best of the big ones with 5.3 dB over a dipole, a Cushcraft X9 was 5dB, a Bencher Skyhawk was 4.4 dB, the rest were less than 4 dB, and several big Mosley antennas had negative gain!

73, Jim K9YC
_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>