| To: | k9yc@arrl.net, Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [TenTec] Value of RX Only Antennas |
| From: | Richards <jrichards@k8jhr.com> |
| Reply-to: | Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com> |
| Date: | Tue, 01 Oct 2013 17:27:48 -0400 |
| List-post: | <tentec@contesting.com">mailto:tentec@contesting.com> |
THANK YOU for taking a moment to explain it.
I get that.
===================== K8JHR ====================
On 10/1/2013 4:18 PM, Jim Brown wrote:
The dB reference was for a dipole mounted at exactly the same point as the beam. The result is particularly useful, because "ground gain" (that is, the addition of the ground reflection to the direct signal) is cancelled out. ________________________________________________ _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec |
| Previous by Date: | Re: [TenTec] Value of RX Only Antennas, Rick - DJ0IP / NJ0IP |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [TenTec] Value of RX Only Antennas, Steve Hunt |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [TenTec] Value of RX Only Antennas, Jim Brown |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [TenTec] Value of RX Only Antennas, Steve Hunt |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |