TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TenTec] Value of RX Only Antennas

To: k9yc@arrl.net, Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TenTec] Value of RX Only Antennas
From: Richards <jrichards@k8jhr.com>
Reply-to: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Date: Tue, 01 Oct 2013 15:44:33 -0400
List-post: <tentec@contesting.com">mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
Interesting observation, JB. Now, I am NOT being critical or picky, but just for my edification, are the numbers you quote dBi or dBd or something else? I am interested in understanding the relative values, wondering what exactly you mean by "x dB gain" - gain over what other number? Again, I ask not to be critical, but to understand the exact magnitude of the numbers.

I got a LOT out of the vertical antenna comparison report prepared by K7LXC and N0AX, in which they compared a number of multiband vertical antennas to a "reference antenna" - and after reading that report, I concluded the reference antenna held up pretty darned well against the pack, so I built it, instead of buying any of the modes tested against it. Based on the data presented, the "control" antenna seemed the best bang for the buck, and it has worked well for me. Go figure.

Thanks.
---------------  K8JHR  ---------------------







On 10/1/2013 2:48 PM, Jim Brown wrote:

VERY difficult to get much more than about 5 dB gain over a dipole with
a collection of aluminum on a boom. That was the clear result of
extensive measurements by N0AX and K7LXC of a dozen or so of a broad
selection of tri-banders.

___________________________________________________
_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>