TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TenTec] RADIO COMPARISONS

To: tentec@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [TenTec] RADIO COMPARISONS
From: w8au@sssnet.com
Reply-to: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2014 00:54:48 -0400
List-post: <tentec@contesting.com">mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
At 11:48 PM 7/28/2014, K8JHR wrote:
There is no reason a new operator should start with a simple, less capable rig. Why hobble him early on. The default settings on any rig will serve well, while he learns to use its more esoteric features. He should buy whatever radio suits his taste, budget, and expectations. The Omni VII was my first ham transceiver and I am glad I did not buy the first piece of road kill found at a local hamfest, as many other hams recommend.

Au contraire, JR: Learning to copy through QRM due to barn-door selectivity did wonders for developing mental selectivity that aided contesting endeavors tremendously. Starting with a top level RX would not accustom one to this rigorous training. Would I go back to using my old cheap Halli S-19R? Not a chance
but I am very grateful for the experience I got using it.

I liken this to my xyl's (also a ham) reaction to noise and static that I can copy through, but she can't handle. ;-) .

Perry   w8au



On 7/28/2014 3:51 PM, Rick - DJ0IP / NJ0IP wrote:

Indy drivers don't just jump in an Indy car for their first race, they work
up to it.
Somebody gave that poor chap some expensive and bad advice.
____________________________________________________
_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>