TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TenTec] Zepp?

To: tentec@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [TenTec] Zepp?
From: Don Jones <ko7i@comcast.net>
Reply-to: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2014 18:01:18 -0700
List-post: <tentec@contesting.com">mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
The 44 ft OCFD experiment has been taken down, to tweeky in tuning, never bothered to "measure it" with the MFJ-259 - sorry. Went back to the plan old 34 ft doublet because it seems to load up so much better. Still using the 1:1 DXE current balun (thank you for all the tips). Going to stick with this antenna for the remainder of this contest/qso party season. The only change coming is a possible upgrade to a 1.5kW remote auto tuner. (I have a L4B with a full QSK mod).
73 to all, Don KO7i

On 9/14/2014 11:42 AM, Rick - DJ0IP / NJ0IP wrote:
Don, you put me on the spot here.
I have never tried a 44' OCFD.
I have tried both the 66' and 132' OCFD fed at that split, fed with open
wire, but not the 44'.
I don't like to comment on things that I have not actually tried myself.

73 - Rick, DJ0IP
(Nr. Frankfurt am Main)


-----Original Message-----
From: TenTec [mailto:tentec-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of Don Jones
Sent: Sunday, September 14, 2014 5:47 PM
To: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment
Subject: Re: [TenTec] Zepp?

I like the 44ft doublet idea.
But I would like to try the OCF method mentioned by Rick DJ0IP.
Sounds like for a 44 ft OCF antenna the feed point would be 19ft/25ft.
Correct?
Hoping I can get 10M to play better and would like better efficiency as
compared to a 34 doublet on 30M.
73, Don


_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>