TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TenTec] Paragon vs Paragon II - PLL

To: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TenTec] Paragon vs Paragon II - PLL
From: k7mks@comcast.net
Reply-to: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Jan 2016 05:45:09 +0000 (UTC)
List-post: <tentec@contesting.com">mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
Thanks Gary 

Joe 

----- Original Message -----

From: "Gary J FollettDukes HiFi" <dukeshifi@comcast.net> 
To: "Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment" <tentec@contesting.com> 
Sent: Tuesday, January 19, 2016 6:29:05 PM 
Subject: Re: [TenTec] Paragon vs Paragon II - PLL 

I can’t speak insider facts here but I have had many Paragon 2 radios and none 
of them had PLL issues. 

Gary 



> On Jan 19, 2016, at 5:17 PM, steve jobes via TenTec <tentec@contesting.com> 
> wrote: 
> 
> I have not had any problems with my paragon 2, and can't recall hearing of 
> any issues with them. 
> 
> 73, 
> Steve W1DXH 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -----Original Message----- 
> From: k7mks <k7mks@comcast.net> 
> To: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com> 
> Sent: Tue, Jan 19, 2016 6:14 pm 
> Subject: [TenTec] Paragon vs Paragon II - PLL 
> 
> Did Ten Tec make any performance improvements (ie soldered board conections, 
> etc) in the later #586 PLL over the earlier #585 PLL's ? 
> 
> Thank you. joe k7mks 
> _______________________________________________ 
> TenTec mailing list 
> TenTec@contesting.com 
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec 
> 
> _______________________________________________ 
> TenTec mailing list 
> TenTec@contesting.com 
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec 

_______________________________________________ 
TenTec mailing list 
TenTec@contesting.com 
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec 

_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>