TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TenTec] Scads of used Icom IC-7300

To: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TenTec] Scads of used Icom IC-7300
From: Gary J FollettDukes HiFi <dukeshifi@comcast.net>
Reply-to: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Date: Sun, 11 Sep 2016 18:07:20 -0500
List-post: <tentec@contesting.com">mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
Thank you to those who took the time to explain this apparent dichotomy.

I get it now that you all have opened up with descriptions that clarify the 
question.

I wonder, then, why the 7300 is so much poorer than the Flex 6500?

Gary



> On Sep 11, 2016, at 5:59 PM, shristov <shristov@ptt.rs> wrote:
> 
> Gary J FollettDukes HiFi wrote:
> 
>> Is this not an example of “dithering”?
> 
> Yes, it is.
> 
> 
>> Does this process add up to the ability to digitize 140 dB 
>> signal range with 16 bits?
> 
> Yes, that's the essence of it.
> 
> 
> 73,
> 
> Sinisa  YT1NT, VE3EA
> _______________________________________________
> TenTec mailing list
> TenTec@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>