TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TenTec] Argonaut VI

To: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TenTec] Argonaut VI
From: tim <tim@ke4ke.com>
Reply-to: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Date: Mon, 6 Mar 2017 17:53:51 -0600
List-post: <tentec@contesting.com">mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
Hi,

Yes, I am afraid I was one of those who was some what vocal about adding 160m and leaving out 12m. I am aware that TT received positive comments about adding 160. One comment I had was that I could just see all those SOTA guys climbing to the top of a mountain and putting up their 160 meter inverted V or vertical/end fed. Hehehe.

Still it was a good radio with a fabulous receiver. Would I buy another with 12 meters? Yes, but an Omni and Rebel are higher on the list.


Tim
KE4KE



On 03/06/2017 04:33 PM, rick@dj0ip.de wrote:
Mike, I explained how both versions can be true.
Jack and I still exchange emails regularly.
I KNOW why 12m was not in the radio.  We discussed this and I told he for a QRP 
radio, it would have been better to leave out 160m.  Of course contesters would 
disagree.

As I said, it might also be deemed a cost issue because they would have needed 
to get a larger box.

73 - Rick, DJ0IP
(Nr. Frankfurt, Germany)



-----Original Message-----
From: TenTec [mailto:tentec-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of Mike Bryce
Sent: Monday, March 06, 2017 8:37 PM
To: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment
Subject: Re: [TenTec] Argonaut VI

rick,

that’s the story I got from John Henry.

I was one of the beta tester for that rig and that question came up right from the 
start. Where were 60 and 12 meters. That’s what John Heny told the group of  
beta testers.

If and when Mike gets the Argonaut VI back into production, from my point of view, I’d go 
with 60 meters and forget 12….but that’s just me

Mike, WB8VGE

Mike Bryce, WB8VGE
  the heathkit shop
SunLight energy systems
J e e p
o|||||||o






On Mar 6, 2017, at 1:41 PM, rick@dj0ip.de <Rick@DJ0IP.de> wrote:

Actually it had nothing directly to do with cost.
The reason those bands are not in the radio is, there was no space to
place the bandpass filters.
Of course they could have found a larger box, which would have cost
more, so maybe that's the reason John said "cost".

According to Jack in a private conversation we had, in order to make
space for another band, he would have had to reduce the size of the
cores of the BPF inductors, which would slightly reduce their
performance, so he opted to leave 12m out.  We never spoke about 60m.

According to Mike in a private telephone conversation with me, the new
Argo6's will have 12m.  I don't think he commented on 60m.  And he did
not say how they are doing it but if he says 12m is in, then I have no
reason to doubt him.

73 - Rick, DJ0IP
(ttp://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>