Topband
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Topband: Patience in ARRL 160 Contest

To: "'tree@kkn.net'" <tree@kkn.net>, "'j_fitton@yahoo.com'" <j_fitton@yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: Topband: Patience in ARRL 160 Contest
From: "Shoppa, Tim" <tshoppa@wmata.com>
Date: Tue, 4 Dec 2012 00:46:36 +0000
List-post: <topband@contesting.com">mailto:topband@contesting.com>
I think Rick's recommendations go very much in the right direction for a garden 
variety contest QSO and can be tweaked as appropriate. In the ARRL 160 I was 
called by several guys who went through the N3QE N3QE DE HISCALL HISCALL 599 
599 SECT SECT thing at 7 WPM and I lose the run frequency. I was glad to slow 
down for the slower code guys and when they keep it brief its no problem. Also 
no problem doing fills for DX. Those are snappy back and forth.  BUT slow speed 
plus unnecessary info is just too much.

Tim N3QE

----- Original Message -----
From: Tree [mailto:tree@kkn.net]
Sent: Monday, December 03, 2012 06:54 PM
To: Jim F. <j_fitton@yahoo.com>
Cc: top Band <topband@contesting.com>; Richard (Rick) Karlquist 
<richard@karlquist.com>
Subject: Re: Topband: Patience in ARRL 160 Contest

> 3.  Send only 5NN <section>.  Do not send my call, BK, etc

I'll actually disagree with this.  Sending "my call" eliminates any
confusion about who is being worked.  In many situations on 160 - it is
very handy.  I once got called by W8JI after 10 minutes of CQing with no
answers.  I wasn't really sure he was working me or not since there were
lots of people on the band that I couldn't hear (like all of Europe).

Tree N6TR
_______________________________________________
Topband reflector - topband@contesting.com
_______________________________________________
Topband reflector - topband@contesting.com

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>