Topband
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Topband: Patience in ARRL 160 Contest -- copying weak ones

To: <topband@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: Topband: Patience in ARRL 160 Contest -- copying weak ones
From: "Tom W8JI" <w8ji@w8ji.com>
Reply-to: Tom W8JI <w8ji@w8ji.com>
Date: Wed, 5 Dec 2012 12:50:36 -0500
List-post: <topband@contesting.com">mailto:topband@contesting.com>
I had this happen many times as well but it is especially annoying near the end of the contest when seeking to find those last few contacts that I heard fellows calling CQ and only sending their call ONCE and then maybe waiting 2 sec. or less before sending CQ again. >>>

160, with changing noise and slow deep fades, really does take different operating methods than higher bands.

When things are slow, it makes much more sense to repeat the call more. Like "test W8JI W8JI W8JI" This is better than adding CQ's "CQ test W8JI", or making a short call "TEST W8JI" and repeating it with little or no pause.

Another thing I try to push, but operators do not like to do, is slowing down when things are slow. If you have to call for 10-30 seconds to get a response, or are only making one QSO a minute, it makes no sense at all to operate at 30 WPM.

160 isn't 40 or 20 meters, with an unlimited supply of stations and almost no noise variation or QSB.


_______________________________________________
Topband reflector - topband@contesting.com

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>