Topband
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Topband: Proposal: Off-Frequency CQ Calling on 160 m

To: topband <topband@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: Topband: Proposal: Off-Frequency CQ Calling on 160 m
From: Facility 406 <facility_406@bruteforcedevelopment.com>
Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2025 08:41:03 -0800
List-post: <mailto:topband@contesting.com>
On 11/21/2025 05:36, Mpridesti via Topband wrote:
Funny how the new ops think in terms of channelized frequencies (like the CB 
guys)!

I doubt they are old enough, or CB is known enough.

I'd say over-the air TV, which actually does have channels, but isn't common, or even FM broadcast, where everything is referred erroneously to a channel (Listen to us on channel 103.1!), even though they only exist if one "channelizes" their personal receiver.

I'd say it comes from "streaming media", where everyone that streams THINKS they have a "channel" for their outlet, a common term, and a play on old TV terminology. "Watch us on our TikTok channel!"

On the other hand, they could be following some of our more modern amateur radio convention, like 60m, which has channels, in which case, they may be more with it than the rest of us, since 2002.

I wouldn't jump to blame our CB radio brethren right off the bat, after all, radio, is just radio, and in the grand scheme of things, the amateur hobby aspect of it is barely a molecule of vapour of gnat piss on the dark side of the moon. Funny terms can come from anything within the mHz to gamma-rays range.

Kurt


_________________
Searchable Archives: http://www.contesting.com/_topband - Topband Reflector

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>