Topband
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Topband: Proposal: Off-Frequency CQ Calling on 160 m

To: "Topband@Contesting. Com" <topband@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: Topband: Proposal: Off-Frequency CQ Calling on 160 m
From: Don Moman VE6JY <ve6jy.1@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2025 10:22:08 -0700
List-post: <mailto:topband@contesting.com>
One should always avoid frequencies ending in a multiple of 10 for the
America's and 9 khz multiples for the rest of the world.

On Thu, Nov 20, 2025 at 9:25 PM Karel Matousek <ok1cf@atlas.cz> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> I would like to make a small suggestion regarding CQ calling practices on
> 160 meters. Many stations tend to call CQ exactly on whole-number
> frequencies, such as 1812.0 kHz, 1822.0 kHz, and similar. Unfortunately,
> these exact integer frequencies are often affected by various industrial
> noise products and spurious tones, which makes it very difficult to copy
> weak signals.
>
> A simple solution would be to move just a little off these whole-number
> frequencies—even 100 Hz up or down is usually enough to avoid the
> interference. This small shift can significantly improve the ability to
> hear weak stations.
>
> 73, DX Karel OK1CF
>
> _________________
> Searchable Archives: http://www.contesting.com/_topband - Topband
> Reflector
>
_________________
Searchable Archives: http://www.contesting.com/_topband - Topband Reflector
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>