Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

wind force design criteria

To: <towertalk@contesting.com>
Subject: wind force design criteria
From: w7ni@teleport.com (Stan Griffiths)
Date: Mon, 5 Aug 1996 14:36:36 -0700 (PDT)
Steve:  a number of times I've seen references ON A COUNTY basis to
>>wind force design criteria.  do you know where I can obtain this info,
>>hopefully on line?  my old, old, old Rohn book only has a map of the
>>US.  I'm curious as to the design criteria for Cheshire country in the
>>stick of NH.
>>
>Hi, Charlie --
>
>      It's listed in the EIA/TIA-222-E and F, the newest revision effective
>June 1, 1996.  I have copies and am happy to look them up for interested
>folks.  My plan is to get my Tower Tech web page up and running and
>eventually have the info on-line as I don't think it exists anywhere else.
> The pubs run $80.00 each so not everyone is inclined to have them in their
>library.
>
>      Cheshire County is a 75 MPH zone but is within 100 miles of hurricane
>coastline and the values have been adjusted in accordance with ASCE 7-88 to
>obtain 50-year recurrence intervals.  In other words, check with you local
>building department to see if you are subject to higher winds at your site.
> BTW, 70 is the lowest value that the charts contain so your zone isn't too
>bad except for the proximity to hurricane coastline. 
>
>73 and good luck,  Steve  K7LXC
>
>    TOWER TECH -- professional tower supplies and services for amateurs 
>

Since 70 mph is the minimum listed wind velocity for ANYWHERE in the US, how
come crankup towers are always rated for 50 mph?  I think I know why.  You
can't put any load on them at 70 mph, at least with any kind of safety
factor.  I think we, as a group, should demand 70 mph ratings from crankup
manufacturers.  I know this will negatively impact their business . . . as
it should!!

Stan w7ni@teleport.com


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>