Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

[TowerTalk] RE: Small tribander choice

To: <towertalk@contesting.com>
Subject: [TowerTalk] RE: Small tribander choice
From: W7TS@ibm.net (Ken Kinyon)
Date: Wed, 12 Aug 1998 11:17:57 -0600
Hi Jim and all,
I recently replaced a Mosley PRO-67C with a C3.  I am extremely pleased with the
performance.  I am convinced it works better (I work more stations and get more
positive comments) on 20 and 15 than the Mosley.  As far as aesthetics, in my
opinion it looks great.  There are no big bulges for traps or loading coils and
the elements taper nicely in length from back to front.  I think it is much
better looking than any trapped beam.
73,
Ken

------------------------
Kenneth E.  Kinyon
34 Princeton Circle
Longmont, CO 80503-2106
Voice/fax  (303) 684-0037
E-mail W7TS@ibm.net


-----Original Message-----
From: owner-towertalk@contesting.com
[mailto:owner-towertalk@contesting.com]On Behalf Of Jim Worthington
Sent: Wednesday, August 12, 1998 07:24
To: Tower Talk Reflector
Subject: [TowerTalk] RE: Small tribander choice
Importance: High



Thanks for your comments, Pete. The C3 appears to be the consensus favorite.
My main concern with it is aesthetics. Having full size 20 elements, it is
bigger (in one dimension) than the others and also has far more elements.
This may not go over well with the XYL who has an image of a Cushcraft A3S
or KLM KT-34A being on our roof. However, I may be able to swing it.

73,
Jim AD4J

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Pete Smith [mailto:n4zr@contesting.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, August 12, 1998 8:29 AM
> To: jimw@tstnet.com
> Subject: Small tribander choice
>
>
> I have a C-3 and am extremely satisfied.  Modeled, it is
> within .5dB on 20
> and 1 dB on 15 of the forward gain of an idealized model of the TH-7
> (idealized as in no traps, etc.).  The only thing you give up
> really is F/B
> ratio, but even there it's no big deal.  I don't think there is any
> comparison with the other small trapped antennas you mentioned, all of
> which have very compromised element spacing and trap losses.  The
> mechanical design of the C-3 is also tops, with no traps to
> get fouled up,
> riveted construction and a great boom-to-mast mount.
>
> 73,  Pete Smith N4ZR
> In wild, wonderful, fairly rare WEST Virginia
>

--
FAQ on WWW:               http://www.contesting.com/towertalkfaq.html
Submissions:              towertalk@contesting.com
Administrative requests:  towertalk-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems:                 owner-towertalk@contesting.com
Search:                   http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search.htm



--
FAQ on WWW:               http://www.contesting.com/towertalkfaq.html
Submissions:              towertalk@contesting.com
Administrative requests:  towertalk-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems:                 owner-towertalk@contesting.com
Search:                   http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search.htm


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>