In a message dated 98-08-12 09:23:22 EDT, jimw@tstnet.com writes:
> The C3 appears to be the consensus favorite.
> My main concern with it is aesthetics. Having full size 20 elements, it is
> bigger (in one dimension) than the others and also has far more elements.
> This may not go over well with the XYL who has an image of a Cushcraft A3S
> or KLM KT-34A being on our roof. However, I may be able to swing it.
>
Then a very attractive alternative would be the C-3SS which has a
smaller turning radius than the A-3 by 2 feet making it the smallest TR
tribander around. It also has the best performance when compared to
conventional trap tribanders. I just installed one and it really is compact
physically but offers better-than-average performance.
Cheers, Steve K7LXC
--
FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/towertalkfaq.html
Submissions: towertalk@contesting.com
Administrative requests: towertalk-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems: owner-towertalk@contesting.com
Search: http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search.htm
|