But how are you going to turn the ;lower antenna? I hope you are not
planning on using a TIC ring. If you are, let me know . I'll give you a
great price on my 3rd failed one. NEVER AGAIN.
73, Bruce K1MY
----- Original Message -----
From: <kb9cry@attbi.com>
To: "Bruce Makas" <k1my@msn.com>
Sent: Tuesday, April 02, 2002 11:22 AM
Subject: Re: [Towertalk] 40 meter beam
> Bruce I'm planning the same thing as, but 120 ft., and
> was also planning on one big antenna. Then at a recent
> W9DXCC Convention I heard Jay, W0XB, Array Solutions,
> give a presentation on stacking two smaller 40M beams
> and phasing them. That's now my plan. You get maybe a
> more bang by phasing two together plus you can drive
> them separately; the one at a lower height will work
> better for domestic use. Finally the installation and
> maintenance of two smaller beams is much less than one
> big beam. Hope this doesn't put you back to square one
> but that's my new plan. Gd luck, I'll be interested in
> your decision. 73 Phil KB9CRY
> > I am putting up a 100 foot Rohn 45 with a single 40 meter beam on top.
What
> > do you recommend for an antenna?
> >
> > I have been looking at M2 40M4L 4 element and the Force 12 MAG340N 3
> > element.
> >
> > I am primarilly a DXer but also play in contests. Reliability is as
> > important to me as is performance. Once up I don't want it to break. The
QTH
> > is in the mountains at 7000 foot elevation.
> >
> > I also believe it is the consensus of the reflector that the Orion
> > OR2800P-DC is the rotor of choice. Is this correct? Reliability is the
most
> > important consideration for me.
> >
> > Thanks in advance.
> >
> > Bruce K1MY
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Towertalk mailing list
> > Towertalk@contesting.com
> > http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
>
|