> I do have some doubts as to the validity of the results, since we have a
> sample set of size 1. I believe, at least in major part, that Doug's
> contesting results are due to 4 sets being better than 3. I further
> postulate that the number of guys is even more important when one is in a
> less propagationally blessed area than New England. I would suggest for
> those in the "Black Holes" of W0/W8/W9, BY9/BY0 and JT that 5 to 6 sets of
> guys per tower may be more appropriate.
How do you put the guys underground? :-)
Bob KQ2M
|