Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: [TowerTalk] Re: TH7 Traps

To: Towertalk@contesting.com
Subject: RE: [TowerTalk] Re: TH7 Traps
From: Bill Aycock <baycock@direcway.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2003 09:04:03 -0500
List-post: <mailto:towertalk@contesting.com>

Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2003 08:44:12 -0500
To: Tod - MN <tod@k0to.us>
From: Bill Aycock <baycock@direcway.com>
Subject: RE: [TowerTalk] Re: TH7 Traps


N3DRK commented on the tribander comparison tests:


>I am not damning a very well done effort. Yes the effort was there but it
is
>not scientific. Read your handbook.

How can the effort be "well done" if the results are "unscientific"?
I am puzzled by these comments (repeated later), with no apparent basis or understanding. Which handbook, and where in the handbook? In what way is the report unscientific? Which aspect of science is violated?
These references to non-science appear to be nonsense to me. (Pun intended)
Bill


Bill Aycock - W4BSG
Woodville, Alabama

Bill Aycock - W4BSG
Woodville, Alabama



_______________________________________________


See: http://www.mscomputer.com for "Self Supporting Towers", "Wireless Weather Stations", and lot's more. Call Toll Free, 1-800-333-9041 with any questions and ask for Sherman, W2FLA.

_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>