Sorry, should be "I know better now", Too fast fingers!
73 Jim
-------
Jan Erik Holm wrote:
> The whole antenna is importand, don´t forget ground losses.
> Back in the 60:ties people was thinking that a Inv V was
> better then a dipole, atleast I know better know!
>
> 73 Jim
> ---------
>
> WA3GIN in Alex. City, VA wrote:
>
>
>>That dropping concept in reality works fine. Most of the radiating work
>>is done much closer to the feed point, the first 1/8 wave of wire either
>>side of the feed point.
>>
>>73,
>>dave
>>wa3gin
>>
_______________________________________________
See: http://www.mscomputer.com for "Self Supporting Towers", "Wireless Weather
Stations", and lot's more. Call Toll Free, 1-800-333-9041 with any questions
and ask for Sherman, W2FLA.
_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
|