HAH,
Actually, I thought the persons interviewed were pretty mild mannered
about it. I suppose it would be less of a problem if there were 100ft
oak trees lining the streets but because the development was almost
desert like with regard to greenery the "beautiful" antenna did
stick-out a bit. Still, I thought it looked great but I'm biased.
I also thought the spokes person was pretty fair minded about it. All
and all the media coverage was even handed. I felt sorry for the ham
radio operator who had no trees to tie dipole wires to and such, haha
73,
dave
wa3gin
Jeff Stai wrote:
>At 10:14 PM 5/10/2006, Michael Tope wrote:
>
>
>>I think people who have nothing better to do than to stand
>>around their yards and grouse about their neighbor's ham
>>antenna are a nuisance. If they want to do that, they should
>>move to the country where nobody else will have to listen to
>>them :):)
>>
>>
>
>please no - then they'll complain about the cows! (trust me, they will!) - 73
>- j
>
>
>--
>Jeff Stai jds@twistedoak.com
>Twisted Oak Winery http://www.twistedoak.com/
>Rocketry Org. of CA http://www.rocstock.org/
>Amateur Radio WK6I ~ Calaveras County, CA
>See you in the California QSO Party! ~ Oct 7-8 2006 ~ http://www.cqp.org/
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>TowerTalk mailing list
>TowerTalk@contesting.com
>http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
>
>
>
>
_______________________________________________
_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
|