Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TowerTalk] Climbing belts/harnesses demonstration

To: towertalk reflector <towertalk@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] Climbing belts/harnesses demonstration
From: GALE STEWARD <k3nd@yahoo.com>
Date: Thu, 15 Jun 2006 08:02:13 -0700 (PDT)
List-post: <mailto:towertalk@contesting.com>
SNIP

> Unfortunately, the OSHA link above doesn't give any
> of the background as to 
> "why attach to the back".
> The OSHA requirement is also specific to the
> construction industry, and so, 
> the back attachment requirement may be construction
> specific.
> 
I have read that the reason for using the back D-ring
was that in a fall, when the shock absorbing lanyard
would pull tight, head would drop FORWARD until your
chin contacted the upper chest. This would limit the
forward/downward movement of the head & neck. 

With the shock absorbing lanyard attached to the front
D-ring, the opposite would happen and your head would
snap to the rear. Since nothing would limit the
head/neck motion, you could easily suffer a broken
neck.

Since the body allows the head/neck/shoulders to slump
forward naturally, with the reverse NOT being true,
The back D-ring seems like the only place to attach
the
shock absorbing lanyard.

Wishing all a SAFE tower working season!

73, Stew K3ND

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 
_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>