Well why not just split the "risk"?
Prepare an agreement where the homeowner and ham split either the increase or
decrease in property value? When the property value increases, it's a win-win
situation! You could even sell that paper and buy a better rig.
73 de Bob - KØRC in MN
------------------------------
Original Message: 9
Date: Mon, 14 May 2007 9:57:52 -0500
From: <ve4xt@mts.net>
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] Got a tower/antenna in a CC&R subdivision?
To: Bill Turner <dezrat@copper.net>, <towertalk@contesting.com>
Message-ID: <5s1ihs$5gqrae@wnpgmb02-c600c.mts.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
> Why not just put it in writing that you personally will make up the
> difference in property values if anyone suffers a loss because of your
> tower/antenna?
Because it would be a blank cheque (sorry, that's Canadian for check) to
anyone whose property value declined for any number of reasons. YOU
would be the reason the property declined, not general market weakness,
not because the neighbour forgot to paint his porch for 25 years and not
because the neighbour's house was built over a sacred burial ground.
Your proving otherwise would be very expensive, so much so that it might
be cheaper to just pay the difference and shut up.
Not sure anyone wants to sign a blank check like that.
73, kelly
ve4xt
------------------------------
_______________________________________________
_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
|