You bet. There are plenty of VERY windy areas in
California. This area is just east of the Sierra Nevada
mountains and is typically windy. We frequently have 30-50
MPH winds but rarely anything over 70 MPH. The County
however has decided to bump the Basic Wind Speed up from 80
MPH to 100 MPH for this area.
Bob
----- Original Message Follows -----
From: RICHARD SOLOMON <w1ksz@q.com>
To: TowerTalk <towertalk@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] LM-470 at 100 MPH
Date: Sun, 30 Nov 2008 03:46:52 +0000
> 100 MPH winds ??? In California ?? They expecting Global
> Warming to cause Typhoons to hit ??
>
> 73, Dick, W1KSZ> From: k6zz@ccis.com> To:
> bmaser@tampabay.rr.com; towertalk@contesting.com> Date:
> Sat, 29 Nov 2008 19:40:22 -0800> Subject: Re: [TowerTalk]
> LM-470 at 100 MPH> > Obviously true, however the building
> department won't look> at it that way. They'll want to see
> an> analysis/certification showing the conditions under
> which> the structure will meet the wind loading
> requirements. They> may accept my committment to "keep it
> cranked down when the> winds are up", but I suspect not.
> I'll find out soon> enough.> > Bob > > ----- Original
> Message Follows -----> From: "Bob Maser"
> <bmaser@tampabay.rr.com>> To: <k6zz@ccis.com>,
> <towertalk@contesting.com>> Subject: Re: [TowerTalk]
> LM-470 at 100 MPH> Date: Sun, 30 Nov 2008 02:50:01 -0000>
> > > Anybody that leaves a crankup tower up in 100mph wind>
> > potential deserves to lose it. I guarantee you that a> >
> LM470 cranked all the way down will not be blown down in>
> > any wind. Of course, the elements will be stripped off>
> > the boom
> long before, then goes the boom.> > > > Bob W6TR> > -----
> Original Message ----- > > From: "Bob Selbrede, K6ZZ"
> <k6zz@ccis.com>> > To: <towertalk@contesting.com>> > Sent:
> Sunday, November 30, 2008 1:32 AM> > Subject: [TowerTalk]
> LM-470 at 100 MPH> > > > > > > Hello,> > >> > > Has anyone
> had the Triex LM-470 professionally evaluated> > > for
> antenna load capacity in a 100 MPH Basic Wind Speed> > >
> zone? Turns out our local building code will be changing>
> > > on 1 Jan 09 to require new structures to meet the 100>
> > > MPH requirement. I suspect most free standing crankup>
> > > towers, fully extended, may not handle these wind> > >
> conditions unloaded let alone with a good size tribander>
> > > on them. How does an 85 MPH 3 second gust rating of
> 18> > > Sq Ft look at 100 MPH? I would estimate around 4
> Sq Ft.> > >> > > 73, Bob K6ZZ> > >> > >
> _______________________________________________> > >> > >>
> > >> > > _______________________________________________>
> > > TowerTalk mailing list
> > > > TowerTalk@contesting.com> > >
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk > >
> > > _______________________________________________> > > >
> > > > > _______________________________________________> >
> TowerTalk mailing list> > TowerTalk@contesting.com> >
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk >
> _______________________________________________> > > >
> _______________________________________________> TowerTalk
> mailing list> TowerTalk@contesting.com>
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
> _______________________________________________
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> TowerTalk mailing list
> TowerTalk@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
_______________________________________________
_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
|