Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TowerTalk] 43' verticals

To: "'jimlux'" <jimlux@earthlink.net>
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] 43' verticals
From: "W0MU Mike Fatchett" <w0mu@w0mu.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 08:18:33 -0700
List-post: <towertalk@contesting.com">mailto:towertalk@contesting.com>
Transmit.  I have 4 sq receive arrays using small whips.  They work great. 


"A slip of the foot you may soon recover, but a slip of the tongue you may
never get over." Ben Franklin
-----Original Message-----
From: towertalk-bounces@contesting.com
[mailto:towertalk-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of jimlux
Sent: Tuesday, February 17, 2009 7:42 AM
To: W0MU Mike Fatchett
Cc: towertalk@contesting.com; 'K4SAV'
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] 43' verticals

W0MU Mike Fatchett wrote:
> Funny we just had this same hot topic on our local contesting club 
> reflector.
> 
> They might be better than what you had but IMHO they can't be very 
> good for 80/160.
> 
> I wish there were some short miracle antennas for 80 and 160 so I 
> could put up some 4 squares easily.
> 
>  

For receiving or transmitting?

For Rx, height's not all that important (well.. clearly there's a difference
between a 120foot stick and a 8 foot whip, but between a 8 foot whip and a
43 foot mast, I'll bet there isn't a huge difference).

For Tx, I don't know that the radiation pattern is much different between a
43 foot and a 8 foot radiator: they're both "short".  Losses in the matching
network for the 8 footer would probably (almost
certianly) be higher.
_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk

_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>