Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TowerTalk] 133' Vertical on 160?

To: <TOWERTALK@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] 133' Vertical on 160?
From: "Al Williams" <radioman007@comcast.net>
Date: Mon, 4 May 2009 17:14:30 -0700
List-post: <towertalk@contesting.com">mailto:towertalk@contesting.com>
Does this mean that increasing the length of the 133' high vertical by 
adding horizontal wire is better than just the 133' vertical?

k7puc



----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Jim Brown" <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>
To: <TOWERTALK@contesting.com>
Sent: Monday, May 04, 2009 2:44 PM
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] 133' Vertical on 160?


> On Mon, 4 May 2009 17:31:05 -0400, john@kk9a.com wrote:
>
>> it worked great, even with
>>a much less than perfect ground system.
>
> Yes. And, of course, making the antenna longer increases its
> radiation resistance, which in turn reduces the losses in the radial
> system. A good radial system still helps, but it is a few dB less
> important.
>
> 73,
>
> Jim Brown K9YC
>
>
> _______________________________________________
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> TowerTalk mailing list
> TowerTalk@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk 

_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>