Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TowerTalk] Coax Question

To: "Tower and HF antenna construction topics." <towertalk@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] Coax Question
From: van wd8aam <vlincoln@frontiernet.net>
Reply-to: "Tower and HF antenna construction topics." <towertalk@contesting.com>
Date: Tue, 13 Apr 2010 07:15:58 +0000
List-post: <towertalk@contesting.com">mailto:towertalk@contesting.com>
In regards to long runs of coax, has any thought EVER been
given to RG213 to a remote tuned high power amplifier
at the base of the tower.  I've thought about it, and for
costs, it might be cost effective.  I'm sure someone has this
working for them somewhere.  What do you guru's say to this?
van
wd8aam

At 06:04 4/13/2010, you wrote:
>On Mon, 12 Apr 2010 21:07:25 -0400, Steve Bagley wrote:
>
> >I am putting up a tower and will need to run about 500 feet of coax.
>
>http://audiosystemsgroup.com/Coax-Stubs.pdf
>
>500 ft is a LONG run. You can easily burn half your TX power (3dB) in the
>coax. Many of us try to keep feedline loss under 1 dB. 500 ft of LMR400 is
>3.3 dB on 10M, 2.3 dB on 20M. Half-inch heliax is 1.1 dB on 20M, 1.6 dB on
>10M. To get under 1 dB on 10M you'll need 7/8-inch Heliax. :)
>
>Another option to consider is CATV hardline. It's pretty low loss, it is 75
>ohm cable, so there will be a bit of mismatch, but that's why God made
>antenna tuners. It's often possible to get it free or cheap. You'll have to
>buy or scrounge connectors and a tool.
>
>Study the data on W3LPL's and K1TTT's website and save your pennies.
>
>73,
>
>Jim K9YC
>
>
>
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>TowerTalk mailing list
>TowerTalk@contesting.com
>http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>