Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TowerTalk] Speaking of the HAM Seriesofrotators...How doyoutell the

To: towertalk@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] Speaking of the HAM Seriesofrotators...How doyoutell the difference.
From: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <lists@subich.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2010 22:49:18 -0400
List-post: <towertalk@contesting.com">mailto:towertalk@contesting.com>
 > According to Hy-Gain they come with the pig tail instead of a terminal
 > strip, but two bearing races rule out the tailtwister any way.

They do now ... but they used the terminal strips for more than 25
years.  There are a lot of old T2X out there that have never been
converted to pigtail.  I don't care for the Cinch Jones plug ...
it's not waterproof/sealed and as far as I'm concerned no better than
the terminal strip.

 > The next rotator I purchase will be an Alpha Spid. Only slightly more
 > than the Ham V and much, much stronger with no ability to free wheel.

Perhaps ... but adding a decent controller (Green Heron?) makes the
system cost substantially higher.  Not that there aren't advantages
to a design that has no fixed stops ...

73,

    ... Joe, W4TV

On 10/26/2010 7:26 PM, Roger (K8RI) wrote:
>
>
> On 10/26/2010 6:15 PM, Joe Subich, W4TV wrote:
>>    >   Almost certainly not a T2X. Wrong wiring for one although it could
>>    >   be a really old one without the pigtail.
>>
>> T2X uses same wiring as HAM II/III/IV/V.  The difference is a
>> larger casting (with through bolts) and a third bearing race.
> According to Hy-Gain they come with the pig tail instead of a terminal
> strip, but two bearing races rule out the tailtwister any way.
>
>
>> The only difference in the controllers between T2X and HAM IV/V
>> is the additional LEDs for CW/CCW (and possibly paint color
>> depending on the era).  Compare parts lists in the manuals at
>> various stages of production and you will find part numbers
>> leapfrogging one another as improvements were introduced in
>> first one then the other series of rotors.
>>
>> ... and yes, the original T2X included the terminal strips ...
>> I have two of them with terminal strips from the late 70's.
> I don't think this one is near that old.
>
> Actually according to the pig tail conversion the wires are of different
> color between the two.  However I think the connectors are the only
> difference in the pigtails.
>
> The next rotator I purchase will be an Alpha Spid. Only slightly more
> than the Ham V and much, much stronger with no ability to free wheel.
>
> Thanks and 73
>
> Roger (K8RI)
>> 73,
>>
>>       ... Joe, W4TV
>>
>>
>> On 10/26/2010 5:29 PM, Roger (K8RI) wrote:
>>>
>>> On 10/26/2010 4:53 PM, n8de@thepoint.net wrote:
>>>> Roger,
>>>> One thing you might try is this:
>>>>
>>>> connect the rotor to a control box, and then push the 'brake' lever.
>>>>
>>>> Listen closely to the 'noise' it makes.
>>>>
>>>> If the sound appears to come from the BOTTOM of the lower housing, it
>>>> may be a HAM-M or similar family.
>>> Already been there<:-)) It's from the side.
>>>
>>>> If the sound appears to come from the SIDE of the lower housing, it
>>>> might be a HAM-III, HAM-IV, or T2X, but I'm sure all the T2X rotor
>>>> housings have definite markings you can't confuse with the others.
>>>>
>>> Almost certainly not a T2X. Wrong wiring for one although it could be a
>>> really old one without the pigtail. I don't know if they made
>>> TailTwisters without the pigtail.
>>> This is sorta like working on a fairly simple circuit without a
>>> schematic although I don't see any problem putting this back together
>>> without a diagram or photo. The only tricky part is the double bearing
>>> race with the one set of bearings setting directly on top of the other.
>>> It takes some good grease to keep them in place.
>>>
>>> The last time I had one of these apart was not long after they came out
>>> with the latest and greatest ...Ham M.<:-))
>>>> NOW ... if you'd like to dispose of any of them,  I'M INTERESTED!!
>>> Sorry, they really aren't mine. I said I inherited them, but when I said
>>> I needed a rotator I was offered one "to use" that might need a bit of
>>> work as it had set around a long time. The wording was I could store it
>>> on my tower for him. (He doesn't foresee needing it for a longgg time).
>>> This way, when I no longer need it he can have it back albeit the thing
>>> now looks like new, inside and out and it was a reasonable way for me to
>>> get a rotator to use for a while.
>>>
>>> I have to admit this has reminded me why I really like the PST61 and
>>> Alpha Spid, Dual worm gear rotators.<:-))
>>>
>>> 73
>>>
>>> Roger (K8RI)
>>>> 73,
>>>> Don
>>>> N8DE
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Quoting "Roger (K8RI)"<K8RI-on-TowerTalk@tm.net>:
>>>>
>>>>> On 10/26/2010 4:18 PM, Roger (K8RI) wrote:
>>>>>> On 10/26/2010 5:34 AM, Todd Coulter wrote:
>>>>>>> Roger,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Maybe this page from Norm's Rotor Service will help.
>>>>>> A little, but I already know it's a ham series due to the extended brake
>>>>>> housing that adds about 4" to the height.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> What I can't find are any designations stamped on the base of the
>>>>>> housing. I'm assuming that means the bottom outside of the base?  There
>>>>>> is no mast extension to cover the base. There is a single digit followed
>>>>>> by a dash and IIRC 3 digits,
>>>>> Those numbers are 5 604 (space between the 5 and 604) and are the only
>>>>> thing on the base.There is nothing on the outside of the base cover
>>>>> which is the brake and nothing on the bell.
>>>>>
>>>>> It appears to be a Ham IV, but could be a older Ham M and I do not know
>>>>> how to tell them apart based on appearance and parts.
>>>>>
>>>>> 73
>>>>>
>>>>> Roger (K8RI)
>>>>>> but nothing that resembles the codes
>>>>>> depicted on norms page which BTW if you wear bifocals is very difficult
>>>>>> to read with the text overlaying the charts.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Even then, there is nothing to tell me what's different between the
>>>>>> different models even if I do find a designation which seems to be
>>>>>> missing. The controller is just the generic "ham" controller.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 73
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Roger (K8RI)
>>>>>>> http://rotorservice.com/serv3%20identify.htm
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> 73's
>>>>>>> Todd
>>>>>>> N4JRZ
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>>>>> From: towertalk-bounces@contesting.com
>>>>>>> [mailto:towertalk-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of Roger (K8RI)
>>>>>>> Sent: Tuesday, October 26, 2010 2:07 AM
>>>>>>> To: TOWERTALK@contesting.com
>>>>>>> Subject: [TowerTalk] Speaking of the Han Series of rotators...How do you
>>>>>>> tell the difference.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I recently inherited a couple of basket cases. They appear to be ham
>>>>>>> IV's but how do you tell the ham IV rotator minus control box,  from the
>>>>>>> other models?  Other than having to clean out a lot of dirt and replace
>>>>>>> the bearings...I replaced the terminal strips with the TailTwister
>>>>>>> pigtails and connectors. Welll... I really didn't have to replace the
>>>>>>> bearings, but I like shiny bearings rather than old dull black ones.
>>>>>>> That and I discovered you can purchase them from Hy-gain including the
>>>>>>> retainers for between 1/3 and 1/4 the price at the hardware store which
>>>>>>> used to be an inexpensive place to get things like that.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> 73
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Roger (K8RI)
>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>> TowerTalk mailing list
>>>>>>> TowerTalk@contesting.com
>>>>>>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
>>>>>>> No virus found in this incoming message.
>>>>>>> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
>>>>>>> Version: 9.0.862 / Virus Database: 271.1.1/3219 - Release Date: 10/25/10
>>>>>>> 14:34:00
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>> TowerTalk mailing list
>>>>>>> TowerTalk@contesting.com
>>>>>>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> TowerTalk mailing list
>>>>>> TowerTalk@contesting.com
>>>>>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
>>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> TowerTalk mailing list
>>>>> TowerTalk@contesting.com
>>>>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> TowerTalk mailing list
>>>> TowerTalk@contesting.com
>>>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
>>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> TowerTalk mailing list
>>> TowerTalk@contesting.com
>>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> TowerTalk mailing list
>> TowerTalk@contesting.com
>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
>>
> _______________________________________________
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> TowerTalk mailing list
> TowerTalk@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
>
_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>