Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TowerTalk] Smaller tribander

To: "'Kelly Taylor'" <ve4xt@mts.net>, <towertalk@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] Smaller tribander
From: "James C. Hall, MD" <nwtcc@earthlink.net>
Date: Sat, 12 Feb 2011 19:23:49 -0600
List-post: <towertalk@contesting.com">mailto:towertalk@contesting.com>
I like the Force 12 XR-5. I have two in a stack. Single feedline and you get
good performance on 12/17M. Works for me. Also you might consider the
Skyhawk.

73, Jamie
WB4YDL

-----Original Message-----
From: towertalk-bounces@contesting.com
[mailto:towertalk-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of Kelly Taylor
Sent: Saturday, February 12, 2011 5:07 PM
To: towertalk@contesting.com
Subject: [TowerTalk] Smaller tribander

Hi all

Putting up a 48' tower at the cottage this summer. Looking for suggestions
on smaller, but not micro (MA5B, etc) tribander to put up. 

I have ZERO interest in WARC bands. 

Also, would the experts agree that at 50', there may not be a whole lot of
point to adding a 40m dipole (like the c4s or ta33 with 40m add-on).

I plan to put up my kick-ass MA8040v for 40 and 80, as well as an inverted
vee for 80. 

Tnx
 Kelly
ve4xt

Sent from my iPhone
_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk


-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.

_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>