I think it is a misnomer to call them ..."Laws"... . They are theories
that explain a phenomenon to
which the majority of the scientific community subscribe to, at this
present time. They are not Holy
Writ, as past history would attest to.
73, Dick, W1KSZ
Charter Member: Flat Earth Society
On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 11:56 AM, Steve Hunt <steve@karinya.net> wrote:
> You're quite mistaken - none of the Laws of Physics had to be adjusted.
> What changed was that they were applied more completely to the problem
> instead of making simplifying assumptions - that's a quite different issue!
>
> 73,
> Steve G3TXQ
>
>
>
> On 13/05/2011 18:58, Blair S Balden wrote:
>> Hi everyone, my 2 cents:
>> Re the bumblebees: It looks like the "Laws of Physics" had to be adjusted
>> in the face of reality (at least our understanding of the laws of physics).
>> Just proves we don't know everything there is to know about our universe
>> yet, so we shouldn't be too doctrinaire about our current version of the
>> "Laws." We should always be prepared to adjust the laws based on
>> observations of reality. Theory is important, and so is observation. So is
>> keeping an open mind about the correctness or completeness of any given
>> theory.
>> Best regards,
>> Blair NP2F
>>
> _______________________________________________
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> TowerTalk mailing list
> TowerTalk@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
>
_______________________________________________
_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
|