Anyone who thinks the people in the U.S. Patent Office that review
patent submissions are knowledgeable enough to make the judgments they
do hasn't had much experience with them. I'm sure they do the best they
can in general, but some of the most ridiculous stuff routinely gets
patented anyway and some almost incomprehensible decisions on existing
patents have been made. Anyone who works in a tech industry probably
can cite at least a few examples from personal experience.
Dave AB7E
On 2/7/2012 10:33 AM, Mike & Becca Krzystyniak wrote:
> For many of the same reasons I agree with Wilson too. But obviously the
> examiners saw something in the claims that they approved of (the so called
> flux capacitor).
>
>
>
> Out of curiosity I did a patent search and it appears that in the week 50
> registry (December 13, 2011) there is language that suggests the patent is
> being reexamined at the request of a Colorado law firm.
>
>
>
> Search on: http://www.uspto.gov/web/patents/patog/week50/OG/TOC.htm
>
>
>
> and word search the page for: 7,423,588 and if you click on the patent
> number you also get the claims summary which tells you a lot more than just
> the schematic.
>
>
>
> Not being a lawyer I wonder what the "reexam" means?
>
>
>
> FYI. 73 Mike K9MK
>
>
>
_______________________________________________
_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
|