Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TowerTalk] Hi-Z Antenna Stuff

To: <towertalk@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] Hi-Z Antenna Stuff
From: "Mike & Becca Krzystyniak" <k9mk@flash.net>
Date: Tue, 7 Feb 2012 16:45:14 -0600
List-post: <towertalk@contesting.com">mailto:towertalk@contesting.com>
I'm guessing most companies do not bother to patent novel manufacturing
methods or process related inovation as that stuff is usually rather narrow
in nature.  

The know the company I worked for kept it proprietary as a competitive edge.


Alrighty then...   Back to tower talk...  ;-)



-----Original Message-----
From: towertalk-bounces@contesting.com
[mailto:towertalk-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of Jack/W6NF
Sent: Tuesday, February 07, 2012 4:06 PM
To: towertalk@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] Hi-Z Antenna Stuff

On 2/7/2012 12:29 PM, Jim Lux wrote:
> On 2/7/12 9:33 AM, Jack/W6NF wrote:
>
>> What the hell did Rausch patent that was so unique and different that 
>> a patent was possible? Or can you patent something whereby everything 
>> is well known but you hold you head just so in the assembly process?
>
> Why, yes, that is EXACTLY what patents are for.  You take things that 
> are ordinary and commonplace and combine them in a new and novel way 
> to produce something of use.
>
> How it is produced could also be part of the patent (that's a "method"
> patent).
>
>
> _______________________________________________
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> TowerTalk mailing list
> TowerTalk@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
>
Okay...if the technical aspects of a product is well-known, and not
patentable in and of itself, then only the specifics of production and
packaging are part of the protection of the patent. I've heard about a
pharmaceutical company that attempted to patent a medication on the basis of
alterations in capsule shape and color. I don't believe that got very far.

If the "method" is duplicated that's one thing but if the packaging and
assembly of well-known circuitry is substantially different then what is the
basis for an infringement claim?

There are quite a few of us interested in the answer.


--
Jack, W6NF
Silver Springs, NV
DM09ji

_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk

_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>