Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TowerTalk] When is a 100' tower only 97' tall?

Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] When is a 100' tower only 97' tall?
From: Chris <EZRhino@fastmovers.biz>
Date: Wed, 8 Aug 2012 09:40:55 -0600
List-post: <towertalk@contesting.com">mailto:towertalk@contesting.com>
I think this calls for a class action lawsuit!  LOL!

Chris
KF7P







On Aug 8, 2012, at 9:31 AM, Cqtestk4xs@aol.com wrote:

> Been that way for years,  Rohn 20 is the same.  Rohn 45  and 55 is longer 
> and gives you a true 10 ft.  On the other hand the DX  station will never be 
> able to tell the difference between a 66 footer and a 68  footer.
> 
> Bill K4XS/KH7XS
> 
> 
> In a message dated 8/8/2012 3:25:39 P.M. Greenwich Standard Time,  
> johnb3030@comcast.net writes:
> 
> 
> effective height of a 10' section is only 9' 8.5". While not  significant 
> for one section, it quickly adds up on a tall  tower.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> TowerTalk mailing list
> TowerTalk@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
> 

Apparently I am supposed to be more concerned about the way Mitt Romney spends 
his money than how Obama spends mine.



_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>