Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

[TowerTalk] FW: Fwd: Worm Gears

To: <towertalk@contesting.com>
Subject: [TowerTalk] FW: Fwd: Worm Gears
From: "Matt" <maflukey@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2015 23:13:21 -0500
List-post: <towertalk@contesting.com">mailto:towertalk@contesting.com>
???  Please explain.

KM5VI

-----Original Message-----
From: TowerTalk [mailto:towertalk-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of Hans
Hammarquist via TowerTalk
Sent: Tuesday, July 14, 2015 4:25 PM
To: towertalk@contesting.com
Subject: [TowerTalk] Fwd: Worm Gears

Any gear with a 50% or better efficiency is NOT self breaking and will
require a break. Even a slightly lower than 50% might (most possible) need a
break as the efficiency will increase with time as the gear will "wear in".


Hans - N2JFS



-----Original Message-----
From: Wilson <infomet@embarqmail.com>
To: John Santillo N2HMM <n2hmm@warwick.net>
Cc: towertalk <towertalk@contesting.com>
Sent: Tue, Jul 14, 2015 1:37 pm
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] Worm Gears


Hub City touts their helical gear units, at 90+% efficiency vs 60% for
worms.
I
don't know about their resistance to back driving, but at 50-60:1, it
wouldn't take much of a brake...
WL




 
_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk

_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>