Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TowerTalk] AN Wireless

To: towertalk@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] AN Wireless
From: David Gilbert <xdavid@cis-broadband.com>
Date: Sat, 7 May 2016 01:08:02 -0700
List-post: <towertalk@contesting.com">mailto:towertalk@contesting.com>

That's a pretty ignorant comment. I own an HD-70 tower and I have the pictures to prove it.

http://www.ab7e.com/AB7E_Tower_Page_1.html

It is indeed a brute. I'm actually afraid of heights, but that tower is so sturdy that as long as I'm strapped in with my full body harness and three straps I'm comfortable working up at the top. I've been up there in 60 mph winds and can barely feel any sway in the tower (with about 20 sq ft of antenna at the top). A local wireless ISP uses my tower and had to get an engineering study done on it to satisfy the local zoning people ... they came back and said that my tower was only 18% loaded.

Educate yourself and read the engineering study referenced by VE7RF. The folks who vouch for the AN Wireless towers aren't shills ... they just know more than you do.

By the way, my 70 foot HD-70 tower was installed per the recommended base at the time (2008). It was spec'd at 9 ft by 9ft by 5ft, which works out to be right at 15 cubic yards of concrete. Mine ended up slightly larger because of the nasty large rocks in my soil ... it's impossible to cut a clean hole here.

Dave   AB7E




On 5/6/2016 1:02 PM, J.P. wrote:
Cue the AN shills...

XX/7

_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>