Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TowerTalk] AN Wireless

To: towertalk@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] AN Wireless
From: Kevin Stover <kevin.stover@mediacombb.net>
Date: Mon, 9 May 2016 08:37:51 -0500
List-post: <towertalk@contesting.com">mailto:towertalk@contesting.com>
He can "opine" all he wants.
He is an experience tower installer. He is NOT qualified to say the base is "overkill", unless he's grown a mechanical engineering degree recently. And who the hell does he think he is saying Trylon is "good enough" for the average ham?

This wasn't opining, this was using his expertise as a tower installer to talk people out of buying AN Wireless products and buy Trylon...probably from him...on an internet mail forum.

On 5/7/2016 7:47 PM, ve4xt@mymts.net wrote:
Hi all,

It seems to me the question isn't if AN makes good towers or whether they spec 
bulletproof bases. Clearly, they do. Dave is certainly to be congratulated for 
a first-rate installation.

The question is whether an experienced, respected tower professional opining 
the base may be overkill, or whether Trylon is good enough for the average ham, 
rises to the level of defamation.

Does anyone think it does?

Difference of opinion does not equal defamation.

73, kelly, ve4xt

Sent from my iPad

On May 7, 2016, at 3:08 AM, David Gilbert <xdavid@cis-broadband.com> wrote:


That's a pretty ignorant comment.  I own an HD-70 tower and I have the pictures 
to prove it.

http://www.ab7e.com/AB7E_Tower_Page_1.html

It is indeed a brute.  I'm actually afraid of heights, but that tower is so 
sturdy that as long as I'm strapped in with my full body harness and three 
straps I'm comfortable working up at the top. I've been up there in 60 mph 
winds and can barely feel any sway in the tower (with about 20 sq ft of antenna 
at the top).  A local wireless ISP uses my tower and had to get an engineering 
study done on it to satisfy the local zoning people ... they came back and said 
that my tower was only 18% loaded.

Educate yourself and read the engineering study referenced by VE7RF.  The folks 
who vouch for the AN Wireless towers aren't shills ... they just know more than 
you do.

By the way, my 70 foot HD-70 tower was installed per the recommended base at 
the time (2008).  It was spec'd at 9 ft by 9ft by 5ft, which works out to be 
right at 15 cubic yards of concrete.  Mine ended up slightly larger because of 
the nasty large rocks in my soil ... it's impossible to cut a clean hole here.

Dave   AB7E




On 5/6/2016 1:02 PM, J.P. wrote:
Cue the AN shills...

XX/7
_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk



--
R. Kevin Stover
AC0H
ARRL
FISTS #11993
SKCC #215
NAQCC #3441


---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus

_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>