Further to Jim's point,
Even if you accept that you must measure at the output connector of your amp,
the rules certainly do not mandate an accepted norm of station construction.
Just because most people have their amps beside their radios doesn't mean you
can't put your amp as close to the feedpoint as possible.
If you figure you have combined system losses of, say, 3dB between the shack
and base of the tower, and run an amp that takes 50 watts drive to reach 1,500
watts, what's to stop you from running 100 watts drive inside the shack to have
50 watts appear at the amp input? And thus, 1,500 watts going up the tower.
What if you could engineer a box that bolts a 1,500-watt amp to the tower five
feet from your 6-el 20m yagi? A 10-foot run of coax will have minimal loss.
You might be an alligator, but are you breaking any law? (For the purposes of
discussion, let's set aside practicality issues, given it's largely academic at
this point.)
What if that same box equalized the advantage on receive, preamplifying enough
to overcome feedline losses on receive? Or maybe that amp is feeding is a 4-el
80, and you're using beverages for receive anyway.
73, kelly, ve4xt
Sent from my iPad
> On Sep 26, 2016, at 10:04 AM, jimlux <jimlux@earthlink.net> wrote:
>
>> On 9/26/16 7:33 AM, James Wolf wrote:
>> So, if I removed the output connector on my amplifier and wired the coax
>> directly to the output relay inside, does the coax now become part of the
>> amplifier?
>>
>
> It could be.. consider an absurd straw man - you've got your transmitter and
> coax inside a long airconditioning duct out to the antenna, so the only
> "connector" is a the end of the duct. Your transmitter "box" is 2x2x100 ft.
>
> What about coax inside a metal raceway (conduit).
>
> So you get into this rats nest of "where is the boundary line?"... Part 97 is
> silent on this essential detail.
>
> Ultimately, I suspect that if you're not "radiating" too much power, the FCC
> cares not where you draw the line - they show up outside your property with a
> field strength meter, not a magic probe that can see inside the coax.
>
> For another oddball case: consider a resonant compact loop with the loop
> being part of the PA tank. This is real common in consumer equipment.. the L
> in the tank is also the radiator.
>
>
>> Jim - KR9U
>>
>>>>> Jim's right: it's not clear at all what Part 97.313 really means. It
>> provides no standard for measurement and no indication where the
>> measurements should be taken. You can't really say "Well, it's obvious they
>> mean at the transmitter."
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> TowerTalk mailing list
>> TowerTalk@contesting.com
>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> TowerTalk mailing list
> TowerTalk@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
_______________________________________________
_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
|