This came off the NA reflector. NA is looking into adopting the
PTT delay that TR already has. I knew this was an idea that would
catch on someday (took about 10 years). I wonder what the story
is with QSK then.
> From email@example.com Wed Feb 3 12:58:49 1999
> Message-Id: <199902031945.OAA12309@mailfw1.ford.com>
> From: "T Mitchell (Tim)" <firstname.lastname@example.org>
> I just got off the phone with the fine folks at Yaesu who were nice enough to
> talk to me about the MP even though I don't have one.
> Yaesu wants at least 50ms from assertion of PTT to the assertion of any CW.
> They say that if you gave them 100ms they would like that even more but 50ms
> the minimum time they suggest.
> This assumes that the PTT inputs are used, not the CAT instruction. If the
> instruction is used, they suggest a longer time to make sure the cmd is
> received, processed, etc.
> Guess this will have to wait until it is coded. :-(
> Sorry for the bad news (MP owners) but at least we have an answer to the
> 73 Tim K9TM
> Submissions: email@example.com
> Administrative requests: na-user-REQUEST@contesting.com
> WWW: http://www.contesting.com/datom/
> Questions: firstname.lastname@example.org
George Fremin III You know you've achieved perfection
Johnson City, Texas in design, not when you have nothing
K5TR (ex.WB5VZL) more to add, but when you have nothing
email@example.com more to take away.
830-868-2510 -- Antoine de Saint-Exupery
FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/trlogfaq.html
Administrative requests: trlog-REQUEST@contesting.com
Feature Wishlist: http://web.jzap.com/n6tr/trwish.html