To: | N1BUG <paul@n1bug.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [VHFcontesting] FN55 - Transverter drive control? |
From: | "Mike (KA5CVH) Urich" <mike@ka5cvh.com> |
Date: | Sat, 4 Feb 2017 15:57:02 -0600 |
List-post: | <vhfcontesting@contesting.com">mailto:vhfcontesting@contesting.com> |
On Sat, Feb 4, 2017 at 1:04 PM, N1BUG <paul@n1bug.com> wrote: > High power attenuators are expensive and I don't like to be generating 100W > on the IF frequency. MAU wrote I've never done this myself but I've heard of people using a run of high LOSS feedline between the two to act as an attenuater. -- Mike Urich KA5CVH http://ka5cvh.com PIO Harris County ARES STX: (A)PIC Dist 1 & 14 100 watts and a wire. "If serving is below you Leadership is beyond you" _______________________________________________ VHFcontesting mailing list VHFcontesting@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/vhfcontesting |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [VHFcontesting] FN55 - Transverter drive control?, N1BUG |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [VHFcontesting] FN55 - Transverter drive control?, Paul Kiesel via VHFcontesting |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [VHFcontesting] FN55 - Transverter drive control?, N1BUG |
Next by Thread: | Re: [VHFcontesting] FN55 - Transverter drive control?, Jonesy W3DHJ via VHFcontesting |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |