To: | "Mike (KA5CVH) Urich" <mike@ka5cvh.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [VHFcontesting] FN55 - Transverter drive control? |
From: | Jonesy W3DHJ via VHFcontesting <vhfcontesting@contesting.com> |
Reply-to: | Jonesy W3DHJ <W3DHJ@jonz.net> |
Date: | Sat, 4 Feb 2017 15:10:15 -0700 (MST) |
List-post: | <vhfcontesting@contesting.com">mailto:vhfcontesting@contesting.com> |
On Sat, 4 Feb 2017, Mike (KA5CVH) Urich wrote: >On Sat, Feb 4, 2017 at 1:04 PM, N1BUG <paul@n1bug.com> wrote: > >> High power attenuators are expensive and I don't like to be generating 100W >> on the IF frequency. > >I've never done this myself but I've heard of people using a run of >high LOSS feedline between the two to act as an attenuater. The attenuation needed would make for a very quiet receiver operation. Jonesy -- Marvin L Jones | W3DHJ | W3DHJ | https://W3DHJ.net/ Pueblo, Colorado | @ | Jonesy | __ 38.238N 104.547W | jonz.net | DM78rf | 73 SK _______________________________________________ VHFcontesting mailing list VHFcontesting@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/vhfcontesting |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [VHFcontesting] FN55 - Transverter drive control?, Paul Kiesel via VHFcontesting |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [VHFcontesting] FN55 - Transverter drive control?, Mike (KA5CVH) Urich |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [VHFcontesting] FN55 - Transverter drive control?, Mike (KA5CVH) Urich |
Next by Thread: | Re: [VHFcontesting] FN55 - Transverter drive control?, Mark Spencer |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |