Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[AMPS\]\s+MFJ\s+Tuners\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[AMPS\]\s+MFJ\s+Tuners\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. [AMPS] MFJ Tuners (score: 1): Author: KB9RPM@centuryinter.net (John Kjos); Date: Thu, 12 Mar 1998 22:24:02 -0800; I have been considering buying an MFJ-989C tuner for my Ameritron AL-1200.Some of the comments I have been reading are leading me to reconsider.What is up with this the MFJ products?I was under the i; /archives//html/Amps/1998-03/msg00222.html (7,337 bytes)
2. [AMPS] MFJ Tuners (score: 1): Author: jono@webspun.com (Jon Ogden); Date: Thu, 12 Mar 98 23:58:04 -0600; IMHO, MFJ makes decent equipment, not great equipment. Some of the things I have seen made by them are really cheap. They fulfill a certain market in the Ham market place, but I wouldn't buy my KW t; /archives//html/Amps/1998-03/msg00225.html (8,099 bytes)
3. [AMPS] MFJ Tuners (score: 1): Author: wb8jkr@juno.com (Mark S Graalman); Date: Fri, 13 Mar 1998 05:20:12 EST; John, MFJ makes some "neat" products but the quality control in manufacturing and the quality of the parts used is pretty poor 90% of the time. I think of their stuff as novelty idems more than radio; /archives//html/Amps/1998-03/msg00227.html (8,570 bytes)
4. [AMPS] MFJ Tuners (score: 1): Author: j-benson2@ti.com" <j-benson2@ti.com (Jim Benson); Date: Fri, 13 Mar 1998 09:34:08 -0600; John, Years ago MFJ is said to have had lots of Q/C problems. For instance a cousin of mine bought their differential-T tuner and it rolls very rough. Today they're still mass-market (Chevy-like) but; /archives//html/Amps/1998-03/msg00237.html (8,581 bytes)
5. [AMPS] MFJ Tuners (score: 1): Author: watson@stoker.com (George K. Watson); Date: Fri, 13 Mar 1998 12:20:40 -0700; I have had the 989C in service for about 6 months and have had the following 2 problems:The transmit cap became loose and would flop over. It was disconcerting at inconvenient times. The avg/peak swi; /archives//html/Amps/1998-03/msg00243.html (7,730 bytes)
6. [AMPS] MFJ Tuners (score: 1): Author: rdl2@igs.net (rdl2@igs.net); Date: Fri, 13 Mar 1998 14:52:15 -0500; I am happily using a 989C with an AL-80A. The tuner arcs on 160 but that's not its fault...it's just that I've got an 80 m quad loop fed with ladder line at the end of it. The variable capacitors co; /archives//html/Amps/1998-03/msg00244.html (8,361 bytes)
7. [AMPS] MFJ Tuners (score: 1): Author: km1h@juno.com (km1h @ juno.com); Date: Fri, 13 Mar 1998 17:47:18 EST; In the USA we call that a Clinton excuse...failure to accept personal responsibility. A good tuner would not exhibit arcing with any reasonable reactive load. In the real world scratchy is defined as; /archives//html/Amps/1998-03/msg00253.html (10,161 bytes)
8. [AMPS] MFJ Tuners (score: 1): Author: jirka@jimaz.cz (Jiri Sanda); Date: Thu, 1 Jan 1998 00:15:06 +-100; I have been considering buying an MFJ-989C tuner for my Ameritron AL-1200.Some of the comments I have been reading are leading me to reconsider.What is up with this the MFJ products?I was under the i; /archives//html/Amps/1997-12/msg00378.html (7,723 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 8
Page: [1]